The Standard Islamic Claim: Six Days
The Quran repeatedly states that Allah created the heavens and earth in six days. This claim appears in multiple verses:
"Indeed, your Lord is Allah, who created the heavens and earth in six days." — Quran 7:54
"It is Allah who created the heavens and earth in six days." — Quran 10:3
"He created the heavens and earth in six days." — Quran 25:59
The six-day creation timeline is emphatic and repeated throughout the Quran. There's no ambiguity—the Quran clearly claims creation took six days. This parallels the biblical account in Genesis, which Muslims claim the Quran confirms and completes.
The Problem: Surah 41 Says Eight Days
However, Surah 41 provides a detailed breakdown of the creation timeline that adds up to eight days, not six:
"Say, 'Do you indeed disbelieve in He who created the earth in two days and attribute to Him equals? That is the Lord of the worlds.' And He placed on the earth firmly set mountains over its surface, and He blessed it and determined therein its [creatures'] sustenance in four days without distinction - for [the information] of those who ask. Then He directed Himself to the heaven while it was smoke and said to it and to the earth, 'Come [into being], willingly or by compulsion.' They said, 'We have come willingly.' And He completed them as seven heavens within two days and inspired in each heaven its command." — Quran 41:9-12
Let's do the simple math:
• Created the earth: 2 days
• Placed mountains and determined sustenance: 4 days
• Created the seven heavens: 2 days
• TOTAL: 2 + 4 + 2 = 8 days
The Quran explicitly states eight days of creation in Surah 41, contradicting the six days stated in seven other verses.
Muslim Apologetic Attempts
Muslim scholars have recognized this problem for centuries and attempted various explanations:
Explanation 1: "The four days includes the first two days."
Some argue that the four days mentioned for placing mountains and determining sustenance includes the original two days of creating the earth, so the math is: 2 days (earth) + 2 more days (mountains, totaling 4) + 2 days (heavens) = 6 days.
The problem: This interpretation requires reading "in four days" as "in four days total including the previous two," which is not what the Arabic says. The text states creation of earth in two days, then separately mentions an additional period of four days. Classical Arabic grammar doesn't support the "overlapping" interpretation.
Moreover, if Allah meant "four days total," why not simply say "two more days"? The use of "four days" as a distinct period suggests addition, not overlap.
Explanation 2: "The days weren't consecutive."
Some apologists argue that the days mentioned weren't consecutive, so somehow this resolves the discrepancy. But this doesn't solve the mathematical problem—whether consecutive or not, 2 + 4 + 2 still equals 8, not 6.
Explanation 3: "These are ages, not 24-hour days."
Some Muslims claim the word "yawm" (day) means "age" or "period" rather than a literal day. While the Quran does occasionally use "yawm" metaphorically, this doesn't resolve the contradiction. Whether we're talking about six 24-hour days or six cosmic ages, Surah 41 still describes eight of them, not six.
What Classical Commentators Say
Classical tafsir (Quranic commentary) acknowledges the difficulty. Ibn Kathir, Tabari, and other major commentators recognize the apparent discrepancy and attempt to harmonize it, but their explanations involve reading interpretations into the text that aren't naturally there.
The most honest acknowledgment is that the verses, read plainly, do not agree. The attempts to harmonize them require adding meanings and assumptions that aren't explicit in the Qur anic text itself.
A Pattern of Copying Imperfectly
This contradiction is particularly significant because it suggests the Quran was attempting to parallel the biblical creation account but made an error in the retelling. The Bible clearly states:
"For in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them." — Exodus 20:11
The biblical account maintains consistent six-day chronology throughout. But the Quran, while repeatedly claiming six days (apparently borrowing from Genesis), provides a contradictory detailed breakdown in Surah 41.
This is consistent with what we'd expect if Muhammad was recounting biblical narratives from memory or from oral retellings he'd heard, making occasional errors in the details. It's not consistent with divine revelation from an omniscient God.
Biblical Contrast
The Bible's creation account is internally consistent. Genesis 1 provides a day-by-day breakdown:
• Day 1: Light and darkness
• Day 2: Sky and waters
• Day 3: Land, seas, and vegetation
• Day 4: Sun, moon, and stars
• Day 5: Sea creatures and birds
• Day 6: Land animals and humans
• Day 7: God rested
"By the seventh day God had finished the work he had been doing; so on the seventh day he rested from all his work." — Genesis 2:2
Every reference to creation throughout the Old and New Testament maintains this six-day framework. There is no contradiction, no alternative timeline. The account is coherent across multiple books written by different authors over centuries.
The Implications
This mathematical contradiction in the Quran is significant because:
1. It's objectively verifiable. This isn't about interpretation or theology—it's simple arithmetic. 2 + 4 + 2 = 8, not 6.
2. It involves a fundamental Islamic claim. Muslims assert the Quran is perfectly preserved and contains no errors. A mathematical contradiction in the creation timeline directly challenges this claim.
3. It suggests human authorship. An omniscient God wouldn't make arithmetic errors. A human retelling biblical stories from imperfect knowledge might.
4. It shows apologetic gymnastics. The strained explanations Muslim scholars offer demonstrate they recognize this is a genuine problem that requires creative interpretation to resolve.
Questions to Consider
- If the Quran is from an omniscient God, how can it contain contradictory timelines for creation?
- Why does Surah 41's detailed breakdown not match the six-day summary repeated elsewhere?
- If "four days" means "four days including the previous two," why doesn't the text say so?
- Why do Muslim commentators need to add interpretations not found in the text to resolve this?
- How can Muslims claim the Quran is "clear" when this requires complex reinterpretation?
- If the Quran is correcting the Bible, why does it copy the six-day framework while contradicting it in detail?
- What does it suggest when apologetic explanations require mathematical reinterpretation?
Conclusion
The Quran contains a clear mathematical contradiction regarding creation: it repeatedly claims six days but describes eight days in Surah 41. Muslim apologists have offered various explanations, but none resolve the problem without imposing interpretations onto the text that aren't naturally there.
This is exactly what we'd expect if the Quran was authored by a human attempting to retell biblical narratives from imperfect knowledge. It's not what we'd expect from an omniscient, infallible divine revelation.
The contrast with the Bible's internally consistent creation account is striking. While biblical authors across centuries maintained a coherent six-day framework, the Quran contradicts its own timeline within a single text.
Related articles: Who Was the First Muslim?, Pharaoh: Drowned or Saved?