The Truth in Islam - Discover Authentic Islamic Knowledge

The Verse of Harsh Punishment

Quran 5:33 prescribes one of the most brutal punishments in Islamic law: crucifixion, beheading, and the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides. This verse, found in Surah Al-Ma'idah (The Table), establishes punishments for those who "wage war against Allah and His Messenger."

"Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified, or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides, or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment." — Quran 5:33

The Arabic Text and Meaning

Key Terms

The Arabic text specifies four potential punishments:

Yuqattalū (يُقَتَّلُوا) - "they be killed" or "executed"
Yuṣallabū (يُصَلَّبُوا) - "they be crucified"
Tuqaṭṭaʿa aydīhim wa-arjuluhum min khilāfin (تُقَطَّعَ أَيْدِيهِمْ وَأَرْجُلُهُم مِّنْ خِلَافٍ) - "their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides"
Yunfaw mina al-arḍi (يُنفَوْا مِنَ الْأَرْضِ) - "they be exiled from the land"

What Does "From Opposite Sides" Mean?

Classical scholars explain that cutting off "from opposite sides" means:

Right hand and left foot, or
Left hand and right foot

This ensures maximum disability and serves as a visible, permanent mark of the punishment.

Classical Scholarly Interpretation

Who Does This Apply To?

According to Islamic jurisprudence, this verse applies to:

Highway robbers (the most common interpretation)
Those who fight against Muslims
Those who cause corruption in the land (a broad category that can include apostates, rebels, or anyone deemed a threat to Islamic order)
Armed thieves

Ibn Kathir's Commentary

Ibn Kathir explained that this verse was revealed concerning those who attack Muslims, rob travelers, or commit highway robbery. He noted that the punishment varies based on the severity of the crime:

If they kill and take property: execution and crucifixion
If they kill but don't take property: execution only
If they take property but don't kill: amputation of hand and foot from opposite sides
If they terrorize but don't kill or rob: exile

Al-Jalalayn's Explanation

The Tafsir al-Jalalayn confirms that the amputation should be "from opposite sides" and that crucifixion means the person is either crucified alive until they die, or killed first and then displayed on a cross as a warning.

Historical Application: The Uranian Tribe

Muhammad's Own Implementation

The most famous application of this type of punishment comes from an authentic hadith about members of the Uranian tribe:

"Some people from the tribe of Ukl came to the Prophet and embraced Islam. The climate of Medina did not suit them, so the Prophet ordered them to go to the (herd of milch) camels of charity and to drink their milk and urine (as a medicine). They did so, and after they had recovered from their ailment, they turned renegades (reverted from Islam) and killed the shepherd of the camels and took the camels away. The Prophet sent (some people) in their pursuit and so they were caught and brought, and the Prophet ordered that their hands and feet should be cut off and that their eyes should be branded with heated pieces of iron, and that their cut hands and feet should not be cauterized, till they die." — Sahih Bukhari 1:4:234

This hadith shows Muhammad personally ordering not just amputation, but also:

Branding eyes with hot iron
Refusing to cauterize wounds (ensuring death from blood loss)
Leaving them to die slowly in the desert

The Severity of the Punishment

Islamic scholars confirm this hadith is authentic (sahih). While some modern Muslims are uncomfortable with this account, classical scholars had no problem with it—they saw it as a just punishment for apostasy and theft.

Modern Application

Implementation in Islamic States

This punishment has been implemented in various Islamic states throughout history and continues in some places today:

Saudi Arabia: Still practices amputation for theft and crucifixion-execution for serious crimes
Iran: Has executed and publicly displayed bodies in crucifixion style
ISIS: Widely publicized crucifixions of opponents and "spies" (2014-2019)
Sudan: Practiced amputation punishments under Sharia law
Yemen: Has applied amputation and crucifixion punishments

The ISIS Example

ISIS's application of Quran 5:33 shocked the modern world, but it followed classical Islamic jurisprudence precisely. They crucified people accused of being spies, apostates, or fighting against their "caliphate." Photos and videos showed victims crucified in public squares with placards explaining their "crimes."

While most Muslims condemned ISIS, the group's scholars argued they were simply following Quran 5:33 as Muhammad himself had implemented it.

Comparison with Other Legal Systems

The Eighth Amendment

The U.S. Constitution's Eighth Amendment explicitly prohibits "cruel and unusual punishments." Crucifixion, mutilation, and leaving someone to die from untreated amputation wounds would clearly violate this standard.

International Human Rights Law

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 5) states: "No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment."

Quran 5:33's prescribed punishments directly contradict this international standard. This creates tension between Islamic law and international human rights norms.

Biblical Contrast

Jesus Christ taught a radically different approach to crime and punishment. When confronted with a woman caught in adultery (a capital crime under Old Testament law), He said:

"Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at her... Neither do I condemn you; go, and from now on sin no more." — John 8:7, 11

Jesus emphasized mercy, rehabilitation, and forgiveness over brutal physical punishment. He taught:

"Blessed are the merciful, for they shall receive mercy." — Matthew 5:7

The Apostle Paul wrote about the purpose of punishment in the Christian framework:

"The purpose of such punishment is so that his sinful nature may be destroyed and his spirit saved on the day of the Lord." — 1 Corinthians 5:5 (GNT)

The goal is restoration, not mutilation.

The Problem of Abrogation

Some modern Muslims argue that these harsh punishments were only for 7th-century Arabia. However:

The Quran presents itself as eternal and universal guidance
Classical scholars never limited this verse to a specific time or place
Islamic law books (fiqh) continue to prescribe these punishments
Countries implementing full Sharia law today still use these punishments

Questions to Consider

How can a merciful God prescribe permanent mutilation as punishment?
What does it say about Islam that these punishments continue in some countries today?
If these punishments are only for 7th-century Arabia, why doesn't the Quran make that clear?
How do you reconcile "Allah is Most Merciful" with ordering hands and feet to be cut off?
Why did Muhammad order eyes to be branded and wounds left uncauterized, ensuring a slow death?
Can a religion with such brutal punishments truly promote justice and human dignity?

Conclusion

Quran 5:33 prescribes punishments that most of the modern world recognizes as torture and cruel degradation. While some Muslims try to contextualize or minimize these verses, they remain part of Islamic law and are still implemented in some Islamic countries today.

The contrast between Muhammad's implementation of brutal mutilation and Jesus's teaching of mercy reveals a fundamental difference in how these religious figures understood justice. One ordered permanent physical mutilation; the other taught forgiveness and restoration.

For those investigating Islam, this verse raises serious questions about whether Islamic law can be compatible with modern human rights standards and basic human dignity.

Crucifixion and Mutilation: Quran 5:33 Explained